<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Junk Email Filter Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog</link>
	<description>World\'s Most Advanced Spam Filtering Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>New spam Detection Methods Working Well</title>
		<link>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2008/02/28/new-spam-detection-meathods-working-well/</link>
		<comments>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2008/02/28/new-spam-detection-meathods-working-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Filtering Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2008/02/28/new-spam-detection-meathods-working-well/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We now have what I think is the fastest spam bot detection on the planet. Our blacklist are now listing over a million spam bots that have tried to spam us in the last 4 days. We only keep 4 days of data because if we get something wrong or someone fixes their virus problem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now have what I think is the fastest spam bot detection on the planet. Our blacklist are now listing over a million spam bots that have tried to spam us in the last 4 days. We only keep 4 days of data because if we get something wrong or someone fixes their virus problem then their listing will expire in 4 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2008/02/28/new-spam-detection-meathods-working-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Found a new way to detect spam</title>
		<link>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2007/09/09/found-a-new-way-to-detect-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2007/09/09/found-a-new-way-to-detect-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Filtering Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2007/09/09/found-a-new-way-to-detect-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Made an interesting observation on Friday that spam bots don&#8217;t do a QUIT at the end of an SMTP session. Real email servers are polite and after the message is sent they send a QUIT commant to tell the receiving server to close the connection. Spam bots however don&#8217;t send the quit command because the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made an interesting observation on Friday that spam bots don&#8217;t do a QUIT at the end of an SMTP session. Real email servers are polite and after the message is sent they send a QUIT commant to tell the receiving server to close the connection. Spam bots however don&#8217;t send the quit command because the message is sent and sending the quit just takes up time and bandwidth.</p>
<p>The new version of Exim now allows me to test to see if a QUIT has been sent or not and lets me feed my blacklist if certain conditions are met.  We don&#8217;t blacklist just on the lack of quit but it&#8217;s really accurate in itself. If it is combined with any other spam indicating sin then it can be blacklisted. As a result of this our blacklist has increased in size dramatically and a virus infected computer can be detected the first time it touches our system. I think that we are catching nearly 100% of all spam bot attempts on the first try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.junkemailfilter.com/blog/2007/09/09/found-a-new-way-to-detect-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
